Re: are 'tubeless type' tyres harder to break the bead than 'tube type'
I spent a good hour wrestling with my RD04's rear tyre this weekend. Eventually I broke the bead, forced it off and threw it to one side before struggling with the new one. After no more than a couple of hours I'd completed a job that my local dealer charges £25 for. I'm thinking of investing in a £150 tyre fitting contraption now. With two bikes it won't take that long to pay for itself.
I rode the bike 40 miles to work today and the rear felt slightly vague.
I'm wondering whether the new tyre's bead has re-seated properly. How can I tell?
On the other hand, it may just be me. The tyre (Metzler Karoo M&S, since you ask) has a slightly different tread to the old tyre (same model, just a year or so old) and the knobbles are, of course, much more defined that my old - almost slick - tyre. Also, it's the first time I've been on the Twin for a few weeks, having been riding my Tiger which is fitted with Tourances.
So, is it the bike, the new tyre, the new tread or the way I've fitted it?
Last edited by Jacqueslemac; 26-10-09 at 04:09 PM.
1990 Africa Twin RD04
2003 Triumph Tiger 955i
"Do not indulge in dreams of having what you lack, but reckon up the blessings you do possess. Then reflect with gratitude how you would crave them if they were not yours." Marcus Aurelius
Bookmarks