
Originally Posted by
MCN
Dozens of speeding charges have been thrown out of court because cameras used in convictions have been proved inaccurate.
...
Dr Michael Clark ... said two types of laser detectors, an LTI 20.20 and a Pro-Laser II, had both been ruled “deficient” but that action by the Home Office was needed to stop their continued use.
...
Clark said: “We’ve been winning an awful lot of cases, even on appeal in Crown Court.”
...
The court accepted there was a possibility the device had measured the speed of an object reflected in the target vehicle rather than the target vehicle itself, according to Clark. He said: “We were arguing there was a possibility of reflection. The appeal was upheld, and it was a nice, clear judgement. So there you have a case of a device being found to be deficient in some way but nothing much is going to happen. It’s really the Home Office which has to suspend its approval or remove its approval before the floodgates open and everybody gets their money back.”
Bookmarks