Why compare voltage?? The cap will be roughly 14.4v if it's higher than that it's not more efficient it's broken
Not really comparing Voltage at higher revs with no load. What I'll do is run it at idle with headlights on HI. For sure this is going to put the battery into 'draino' mode. Therefore Voltage will drop well below top charging V. If the new model outputs more it will hopefully outut more at idle or at least the Voltage should show a bit higher. I'll check V with no lights and at higher revs too for a complete comparo.
How about I measure V at idle and slowly run the revs up noting V at various revs and compare? All other things being equal, battery fully charged, engine warm, etc higher output should equal higher V through out the range.
As for the VMax, I think but not sure, the newer units run at a higher Voltage anyway.
Can I suggest you map input AC current to output DC current instead
The test setup for that I'd have to borrow from NASA...
As for SCR being less efficient YES and NO, SCR's on low DC voltage can be hard to turn off so they tend to use a MOSFET in conjunction with an SCR to turn the thing off, MOSFET's on thier own are way too susceptable to EMI and all spark based engines have a beautiful EMI generator in the form of the ignition... MOSFETS still turn the voltage on/off but they don't sink the current through a resistor like SCR's do.. So all in all they're not really more efficient but instead just run cooler at lower output
Ha, you can't fool me. MOSFETS are more efficient, that's why the new bikes all have them.
It'll be interesting to see your results..and whether they have cured the EMI problems that dogged the earier units.
PS..don't forget to measure the DC current you'll need probably at least a 20amp meter
Well with both headlights on HI likely a 5A meter would do it even at higher revs.
[edit]
Just out of interest did anyone know that a rectifier actually runs cooler the more drain you put on the electrical system...
Bookmarks