+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: VFR1200: How did Honda get it so wrong?!

  1. #21
    sean's Avatar
    sean is offline Captain unsensible.......
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Hastings, East Sussex, United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,116
    Thanks
    94
    Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts

    Re: VFR1200: How did Honda get it so wrong?!

    Quote Originally Posted by Chad View Post
    the bike will be right !!! it will ride well , will be comfy, and TBH i think it looks quite good

    however NOT fitting it with the minimum touring size tank of 22ltrs is a fatal error on honda's part
    +1

    i think that this bike will be a bit of a dark horse to be honest, i'm really quite interested in it and cant wait to see one in the flesh so to speak........


    Caffrey - The greatest dog in the world.

  2. Remove Advertisements
    XRV.org.uk
    Advertisements
     

  3. #22
    StumpyFingers's Avatar
    StumpyFingers is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    In London
    Posts
    12,226
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 17 Times in 17 Posts

    Re: VFR1200: How did Honda get it so wrong?!

    I am waiting for the release then I will try a test ride.
    YOU ONLY NEED TWO TOOLS IN LIFE - WD-40 AND DUCT TAPE. IF IT DOESN'T MOVE AND SHOULD, USE THE WD-40. IF IT SHOULDN'T MOVE AND DOES, USE THE DUCT TAPE




  4. #23
    pdsquire's Avatar
    pdsquire is offline Fine, upstanding member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Surrair
    Posts
    2,206
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 18 Times in 17 Posts

    Re: VFR1200: How did Honda get it so wrong?!

    Quote Originally Posted by jasonbc View Post
    I just read the title of this thread properly.

    My question is how do any of us know if they have got it wrong??
    It's the tank that bothers me. The tank.

    The engine will be a cracker; comfort is not likely to be a problem; the finish and quality will be stupendous, but the correct word has already been used about the tank size: unforgiveable. It just feels like a kick in the teeth for customers to build a bike that is so impractical, and WELL below the level of thoughfulness in design for which Honda was rightly famed.

    I'll lust after it alright (though it could be prettier) but I couldn't buy one.
    1997 Jag 3.2 Exec (jangly jangly!); two bicycles; 2001 XL 650 V-1 which is ready for anything, cuts through traffic like a hot knife through butter and just gets better and better and a low mileage Pan European ST1100

  5. #24
    416cc's Avatar
    416cc is offline Red Blooded Biker
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    NW Kent
    Posts
    722
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

    Re: VFR1200: How did Honda get it so wrong?!

    I'll be kind & say that it's ugly...

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3

Similar Threads

  1. You've got it all wrong!!
    By spicy mchaggis in forum Other Bikes
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 26-03-09, 10:15 AM
  2. is it wrong?????
    By z-weiser in forum Chatter
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 13-03-08, 10:45 AM
  3. Who was in the wrong here?
    By Gnasher in forum Chatter
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 09-01-08, 07:25 PM
  4. You know how nothing ever goes wrong?
    By Robster in forum Varadero
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 09-02-07, 03:50 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts