+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: transalp forks USD vs conventinal

  1. #1
    jamie92j's Avatar
    jamie92j is offline bike nut
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    The 'Shire'
    Posts
    526
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts

    transalp forks USD vs conventinal

    ok this isnt a question on which forks will fit etc etc

    its about xr600/xrv750 forks with fork brace vs USD xr650 or cr250 forks

    which forks will be better for use with a transalp? looking at some of the big bikes done by www.africanqueens.de they seem to use normal forks and not the USD type? any reason for this? i know they do have the big 50mm Marzocchis on


    any input would be great!!!!!

  2. Remove Advertisements
    XRV.org.uk
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    StumpyFingers's Avatar
    StumpyFingers is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    In London
    Posts
    12,229
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 17 Times in 17 Posts

    Re: transalp forks USD vs conventinal

    I think it all comes down to personal choice, some think the USD forks look the part whereas some prefer the original look.
    I would expect the forks to behave in the same way regardless of them being USD.
    YOU ONLY NEED TWO TOOLS IN LIFE - WD-40 AND DUCT TAPE. IF IT DOESN'T MOVE AND SHOULD, USE THE WD-40. IF IT SHOULDN'T MOVE AND DOES, USE THE DUCT TAPE




  4. #3
    Plasnart is offline Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Wales UK
    Posts
    71
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: transalp forks USD vs conventinal

    Their advantage on off road bikes is less unsprung mass which makes suspension easier to control and also the fork legs don't have to extend past the axle where they can get caught in ruts and on rocks / roots. I'm not sure they're as strong physically on a big heavy bike as most units are designed for race type machines (on and off road) so a big bike might kill them. I've seen pics of usd forks jujst snapped off at the bottom.

  5. #4
    btbloke's Avatar
    btbloke is offline geriatric
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Northampton
    Posts
    2,474
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: transalp forks USD vs conventinal

    Ktm 950 adv is a nice fit.


  6. #5
    jamie92j's Avatar
    jamie92j is offline bike nut
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    The 'Shire'
    Posts
    526
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts

    Re: transalp forks USD vs conventinal

    Quote Originally Posted by Plasnart View Post
    I'm not sure they're as strong physically on a big heavy bike as most units are designed for race type machines (on and off road) so a big bike might kill them. I've seen pics of usd forks just snapped off at the bottom.

    thats what i really dont want happening, going along off road into a rock and snap! forks/yokes bend, break, snap

    the transalp standard fork width is 41mm and the africa twin 43mm same as the xr600 and 45mm xr650

    so would xr600/africa twin forks be ok? the africa twin is much hevey then transalps and they seem to get along ok

    also cr250 89 forks are a strait swop, anyone know the effectiveness of these forks?

    should i just save my pennies and fing some marzocchi magnums at a beasty 50mm fork width??

    also ktm front forks, strait swop? probly not, machining of the stem will be in order, which is something id rather not do.

    although if im going to the effort of new forks i want to do it right, and surely the bigger the fork width the better? and stronger??

    if i went with the xr600 forks they would be re-springed and valved or what not to make sure there set up for the extra wieght, also a fork brace would be in order??

    iv got just the standard transalp 41mm forks on with progressive springs in and they have had some fair hammer off road and are still on and not broken surely a extra 2mm width would help??

    although what with the extra length these forks provide, it would make the top part where the yokes join weaker?? so the fatter the fork the better??

    ???

  7. #6
    AIRWOLF is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Bolton, Lancs.
    Posts
    2,688
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 16 Times in 16 Posts

    Re: transalp forks USD vs conventinal

    XR250 forks are 41mm so should be an easy swop (using TA yokes), . . . and the TA springs could be used, with a suitable spacer/short spring to make up the length i expect. (it's an option i am considering)

    ps.
    bigger fork leg dia = stiffer = better for racing. must admit the USD's look the biz.
    Last edited by AIRWOLF; 13-04-09 at 11:43 AM.

  8. #7
    jamie92j's Avatar
    jamie92j is offline bike nut
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    The 'Shire'
    Posts
    526
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts

    Re: transalp forks USD vs conventinal

    Quote Originally Posted by AIRWOLF View Post
    XR250 forks are 41mm so should be an easy swop (using TA yokes), . . . and the TA springs could be used, with a suitable spacer/short spring to make up the length i expect. (it's an option i am considering)

    yes i havent really thought of that and keeping the transalp yokes, the xr400 forks are 43mm,

    although both the 250 and the 400 both use the same steering bearings as the transalp so should be a strait swop.

    id really want to go with wider fork width i think

  9. #8
    AIRWOLF is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Bolton, Lancs.
    Posts
    2,688
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 16 Times in 16 Posts

    Re: transalp forks USD vs conventinal

    Quote Originally Posted by jamie92j View Post
    yes i havent really thought of that and keeping the transalp yokes, the xr400 forks are 43mm,

    although both the 250 and the 400 both use the same steering bearings as the transalp so should be a strait swop.

    id really want to go with wider fork width i think
    Do you have 600ta or 650ta ?

    if 600, how do you plan to increase the rear suspension hight to suit ?

  10. #9
    jamie92j's Avatar
    jamie92j is offline bike nut
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    The 'Shire'
    Posts
    526
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts

    Re: transalp forks USD vs conventinal

    iv got the 650

    was planning on flipping the rear lingage thingy

  11. #10
    tom81 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Viborg, Denmark
    Posts
    26
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: transalp forks USD vs conventinal

    check out this thread. I wrote a little bit about what i did to my old TA, though it wasn't pretty
    Changing the looks, doing it up, making it special etc

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Forks.
    By catteeclan in forum Dominator / FMX
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-03-09, 08:32 AM
  2. FMX USD Forks on @?
    By nic_fast42 in forum Africa Twin
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 15-02-08, 09:48 PM
  3. USD forks on 600 transalp?
    By babybadger in forum Transalp
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 29-09-07, 12:43 AM
  4. forks
    By tuggy in forum Africa Twin
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-02-06, 10:57 PM
  5. forks
    By nimrod in forum Africa Twin
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 14-10-04, 10:06 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts