Joined

·
2,992 Posts

bikes currently owned.

This equation may also be re-written as s-1, where s is the number of bikes owned that would result in

separation from your partner.

1 - 20 of 38 Posts

Joined

·
2,992 Posts

bikes currently owned.

This equation may also be re-written as s-1, where s is the number of bikes owned that would result in

separation from your partner.

Joined

·
1,741 Posts

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free

Joined

·
6,127 Posts

Or maybe 3³

The three you need, the three you want, and the three you have

The three you need, the three you want, and the three you have

Joined

·
2,992 Posts

and the three you never should have parted with.Or maybe 3³

The three you need, the three you want, and the three you have

Joined

·
5,009 Posts

Motorcycles are like peanuts.

Who can stop at one?

(Says the guy with currently one motorcycle...)

Who can stop at one?

(Says the guy with currently one motorcycle...)

So, combining the two equations above we have -

bikes currently owned.

This equation may also be re-written as s-1, where s is the number of bikes owned that would result in

separation from your partner.

n + 1 = s - 1

or n = s - 2

So that would mean that the correct number of motorcycles is actually 2 away from divorce and not 1.

Confused of Galway.

Who also has only one bike.........

Joined

·
14,437 Posts

So G - T = N+1

And

G - T = S - 1

Either way T = 1 so you must own enough tools to take thee space of an entire motorbike just to save your marriage.

More tools required, then (though I suspect my wife may give the statement the letter B).

Joined

·
5,009 Posts

Now solve for !G.It's all to do with volume (how big your garage is) - G

But that gets confusing because

N+1 = G means G = N-1

And then there's the bit where N in the context of G is variable, as you could fit nearly 2 Dominators in the space of 1 GS... Nevermind a sidecar. And you need to factor in S for skill, in packing various N into your G.

This could get complicated.

But we also have to differentiate between "S" for separation (see post number 1) and "S" for skill.Now solve for !G.

And then there's the bit where N in the context of G is variable, as you could fit nearly 2 Dominators in the space of 1 GS... Nevermind a sidecar. And you need to factor in S for skill, in packing various N into your G.

This could get complicated.

And then there's the introduction of "Not S" (in a logical sense) for those of a cack-handed disposition.

It is all getting rather interesting.

Joined

·
2,992 Posts

separation from your partner) is very variable.

The value of S can be adjusted by means of bribes. By using bribes, promises, positive cash adjustments to partners account etc. the value of S can best be described as S=Sp+Bs were Sp is previous S before bribe and Bs is bribe size.

Field testing on partner close to me (located in kitchen) showed that there is no limit to the value of S as long as Bs is correspondingly increased.

But is this true in all cases?Field testing on partner close to me (located in kitchen) showed that there is no limit to the value of S as long as Bs is correspondingly increased.

Joined

·
5,009 Posts

If not, there is still the BS factor. ;-)

Joined

·
2,526 Posts

1 - 20 of 38 Posts

Join the discussion

Honda XRV Forum

A forum community dedicated to Honda XRV Trail Bike owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about performance, modifications, classifieds, troubleshooting, maintenance, and more! Open to all Honda models including Transalp, XR, Varadero, Blackbird, NX400 and more.

Full Forum Listing
Explore Our Forums

Recommended Communities

Join now to ask and comment!